Baby - 9.45 βρέφοςa, ους n: a very small child, even one still unborn[1]
When we’re talking about biblical things – and babies are a biblical subject – we need to ensure that we’re using biblical language. The worldly terminology we hear for babies is not biblical. Someone might say that they’re medical terms or to distinguish the stages of growth, but the fact remains that the Bible doesn’t refer to babies as anything but babies!
We don’t find the word “fetus” in the Bible, and especially the word “zygote” (I looked; they are not there!). While these might be perfectly fine medical words, they’ve also been coopted by the pro-murder movement, wrongly called “pro-choice.”
In our section of the Gospels Harmony this week, we read about Mary’s visit to Elizabeth (Luke 1:39-45). It says that “when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the baby in her womb leaped” (Luke 1:41). The Bible called the unborn John a baby, not a “fetus.” John would have been about six months old here (i.e., six months from conception). The word translated baby here (see above) is used eight times in the New Testament (Luke 1:41, 44; 2:12, 16; 18:15; Acts 7:19; 2 Tim. 3:15; 1 Pet. 2:2). It is used for both infants and unborn babies alike. The Bible makes no distinction between the two!
Murderous abortionists like to use words other than “baby” because they don’t want that little person thought of as a person. Then they would have to justify why it’s okay to kill an innocent person. And there is no “exception” or justification for killing an innocent person!
Well, what about a young woman that becomes pregnant by force and not by any voluntary choice on her part? Shouldn’t that be an “exception” justifying her getting an abortion? ANSWER: Do the crimes of one person justify the killing of another innocent person? Of course not! There are no “exceptions” that would justify willfully killing an innocent person.
Well, what about if carrying the baby to term, or delivering the baby, would endanger the life of the mother? ANSWER: Does a life-threatening medical emergency for one person justify the willful killing of another innocent person? Of course not! It is understood that doctors face very challenging situations sometimes, and there is such a thing as triage. But the doctor’s job is to save life, not willfully terminate innocent life. If, while trying to save both mother and child, one or the other dies, it is a tragedy, but tragedies happen in a sin-sick world. That is nowhere close to the same thing as justification for the purposeful killing of an innocent baby!
n neuter
[1] Louw, J. P., & Nida, E. A. (1996). In Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: based on semantic domains (electronic ed. of the 2nd edition., Vol. 1, p. 109). United Bible Societies.