Norm's Notes
Spirituality/Belief • Culture • Lifestyle
Babies Are People Too
January 08, 2023
post photo preview

Baby - 9.45 βρέφοςa, ους n: a very small child, even one still unborn[1]

When we’re talking about biblical things – and babies are a biblical subject – we need to ensure that we’re using biblical language. The worldly terminology we hear for babies is not biblical. Someone might say that they’re medical terms or to distinguish the stages of growth, but the fact remains that the Bible doesn’t refer to babies as anything but babies!

We don’t find the word “fetus” in the Bible, and especially the word “zygote” (I looked; they are not there!). While these might be perfectly fine medical words, they’ve also been coopted by the pro-murder movement, wrongly called “pro-choice.”

In our section of the Gospels Harmony this week, we read about Mary’s visit to Elizabeth (Luke 1:39-45). It says that “when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the baby in her womb leaped” (Luke 1:41). The Bible called the unborn John a baby, not a “fetus.” John would have been about six months old here (i.e., six months from conception). The word translated baby here (see above) is used eight times in the New Testament (Luke 1:41, 44; 2:12, 16; 18:15; Acts 7:19; 2 Tim. 3:15; 1 Pet. 2:2). It is used for both infants and unborn babies alike. The Bible makes no distinction between the two!

Murderous abortionists like to use words other than “baby” because they don’t want that little person thought of as a person. Then they would have to justify why it’s okay to kill an innocent person. And there is no “exception” or justification for killing an innocent person!

Well, what about a young woman that becomes pregnant by force and not by any voluntary choice on her part? Shouldn’t that be an “exception” justifying her getting an abortion? ANSWER: Do the crimes of one person justify the killing of another innocent person? Of course not! There are no “exceptions” that would justify willfully killing an innocent person.

Well, what about if carrying the baby to term, or delivering the baby, would endanger the life of the mother? ANSWER: Does a life-threatening medical emergency for one person justify the willful killing of another innocent person? Of course not! It is understood that doctors face very challenging situations sometimes, and there is such a thing as triage. But the doctor’s job is to save life, not willfully terminate innocent life. If, while trying to save both mother and child, one or the other dies, it is a tragedy, but tragedies happen in a sin-sick world. That is nowhere close to the same thing as justification for the purposeful killing of an innocent baby!



n neuter

[1] Louw, J. P., & Nida, E. A. (1996). In Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: based on semantic domains (electronic ed. of the 2nd edition., Vol. 1, p. 109). United Bible Societies.

community logo
Join the Norm's Notes Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Peter Destroys Premillennialism

Clipped from Bible Q-n-A 290: https://www.youtube.com/live/-NP5ru05VrU?si=nvpGTn2mpiOWP41t

Peter quotes Old Testament prophecy in reference to the establishment of the church of Christ in Acts 2:17ff. Premillennialists say that the church was an "afterthought," or a "plan B," because the Jews rejected Jesus; so, there is no Old Testament prophecy of the church. Both can't be right! Either Peter, an inspired apostle of Christ, is right and Premillennialism is wrong, or Premillennialists are right, and Peter was not actually an inspired apostle of Christ. I'm sticking with Peter! How about you?

00:00:53
The Church's Leadership in Truth

This is a clip from part one of a two-part lesson on Pilate's cynical question to Jesus in John 18:37-38.

00:05:39
Unique Women: Points of Interest from the Genealogies

This lesson goes with Week 1 of the Harmony. There were some technical issues with the video, but the audio is good.

00:32:23
The Acceptable Year of the Lord (audio)

From Harmony of the Gospels: Week 8
PM Sermon for 2-26-23

The Acceptable Year of the Lord (audio)
How Faith Grows (audio)

From Harmony of the Gospels: Week 8
AM Sermon for 2-26-23

How Faith Grows (audio)
Harmony of the Gospels: Week 9 Bible Class (audio)
Harmony of the Gospels: Week 9 Bible Class (audio)
post photo preview
A Prophet Has No Honor in His Own Country

After spending two days with those who believed in Samaria, Jesus returned to Galilee. John 4:45 says that “the Galileans received Him” because they had seen what He had done in Jerusalem. There were Galileans there to see Him cleansing the temple (John 2:13) and the signs He did while there (John 2:23). They saw the same things that Nicodemus had seen, causing him to acknowledge Jesus as “a teacher come from God” (John 3:2). So, it seems strange that John would refer to Jesus’ statements about a prophet having no honor in his own country (John 4:44) right before saying the Galileans “received Him” (John 4:45).

The “testimony” John refers to is found a few times in the Synoptic Gospels (cf. Matthew 13:57; Mark 6:4; Luke 4:24). These passages record Jesus’ rejection in Nazareth of Galilee. Even though Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea, He was consistently referred to as a Galilean because He was raised in Nazareth (cf. John 1:45; 2:12; 7:1-4, 40-43, 52). He was called “Jesus of Nazareth” (John 19:19). So, it may be, before John refers to Jesus’ reception in Galilee, he reminds the reader of how fickle they were in their treatment of Jesus. For example, it is right after this that Jesus rebukes their dependence on “signs” rather than the substance of His teaching (John 4:48).

This passage reminds us of something that often happens with those who teach the gospel. So frequently, we are warmly received in our initial interactions. Then, after revealing the necessity of obedience to the gospel, we are “dishonored.” If we’re just talking about the “fluffy stuff,” we are “received.” But when we preach, “repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins” (Acts 2:38), we are rejected. People love us as long as we provide bread and fish. But as soon as we place any requirements on people, they reject us (cf. John 6:26-27, 60-66).

There are those who are only looking for what they can get, and there are those who want to give themselves to the Lord. The former will reject Jesus because He requires something of them. The latter will receive the gospel and serve the Lord out of love and gratitude for Him. May the Lord help us find the latter and not be overly burdened by the former!

Read full Article
post photo preview
Jesus’ Response to Nicodemus
Harmony of the Gospels: Week 8

When Nicodemus came to Jesus, he recognized Jesus as “a teacher come from God” and that God was with Him. But Jesus doesn’t seem to acknowledge Nicodemus’ recognition of Him. He immediately tells Nicodemus about the new birth required to “see the kingdom of God.” So, what does that have to do with what Nicodemus said?

Nicodemus referred to Jesus’ teaching and recognized that it had divine authority. But what was Jesus teaching? “Repent, for the kingdom of God is at hand” (Matt. 4:17). If Nicodemus recognized that to be a command from heaven, and he did, then he needed to know how to respond to that teaching. That’s why Jesus told him, “unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

Nicodemus had the same problem that all the Jews of Jesus’ day had. They placed all their hope in their physical birth, their genealogical connection to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. They lived under a covenant of physical birth. A Hebrew was born a Hebrew based on their physical genealogy. But the kingdom Jesus was preaching about wasn’t a physical kingdom/nation like Israel. He was preparing people for a spiritual kingdom, His church. To “see” and “enter into” that kingdom would require being “born again,” not physically but spiritually. It is the new birth brought about by “water and the Spirit.”

John and his disciples, then Jesus and His disciples, were preaching “a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins” (Luke 3:3; Jn. 3:22; 4:1-2). The Holy Spirit-inspired command was to “repent,” to change our “spirit” to be in harmony with God’s Spirit. And, having done that, to fully commit ourselves to God through the burial of the “old man” (i.e., the person we were before we repented) to be raised a “new man.”

John and Jesus were preparing people for the kingdom that was “at hand” in their time. Today, we enter that same kingdom the same way they were prepared for it before it came, by believing and being baptized (Mark 16:16), which is being born again by water and the Spirit. Just as we see being done on Pentecost in Acts 2:38, 41. They were “cut to the heart” by the Holy Spirit-inspired word they heard preached that day (Acts 2:37). They were “added to the church” (Acts 2:47) by “water and Spirit”!

What Jesus said to Nicodemus is exactly what Paul said to Titus. That is, we are saved by God “through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5). And, again, to the Ephesians, that Jesus sanctified and cleansed the church “with the washing of water by the word” (Ephesians 5:26).

Jesus told Nicodemus exactly what someone who acknowledges the truth of God’s word needs to hear!

Read full Article
post photo preview
John, the Humble Baptizer
One of John's Greatest Characteristics Was His Humility

The first interaction we see between Jesus and John is when Jesus came to John to be baptized by him in the Jordan (Matt. 3:13). Later, Jesus would say that there was no one born of women greater than John, the Baptist (Matt. 11:11). We have studied about John in previous lessons. Still, there is another characteristic of John that needs to be observed, his humility.

From the first time we see John interacting with Jesus, John’s humility is a prominent feature of this greatest of all the prophets (Luke 7:28). He had already been preaching that he was the forerunner of the Greater One to follow (Matt. 3:11). The One John was sent to announce was so far above him that he wasn’t even worthy to carry that One’s sandals! When Jesus came to be baptized by him in the Jordan, John tried to prevent Him, saying it was Jesus who should be baptizing John (Matt. 3:13). He knew who Jesus was, the sinless Son of God! He always exalted the Savior, never himself. His message was always, “He must increase, I must decrease” (Jn. 3:30). His popularity was never about him!

He had the entire region coming out to hear his message. He was baptizing multitudes of people. His popularity was so great that people even asked him if he was the Messiah (Luke 3:15; Jn. 2:19, 20). “No,” was his answer!  He could have turned his popularity into his own religious movement. If not as the Messianic fulfillment himself, then as a great prophet to be followed above all others (Jn. 1:21). But, again, his answer was “no.” He was the forerunner of the truly great One, for Whom he would prepare them and to Whom he would send them. 

John was the very pattern of a humble preacher of the gospel! He always knew it wasn’t about him. All his work, his energy, and even his life was given to glorify the “Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world!” (Jn. 1:29). If we would be faithful evangelists for the Savior, we must follow John’s example of humility. It isn’t about us! No matter how popular we may be, no matter how many people we have the privilege to teach, baptize, and disciple, it must never be about us. No one will go to heaven because we made them our disciples! (cf. 1 Cor. 1:10-13). The only way to get people to heaven is by being humble messengers of Christ and following John’s example of “He must increase, I must decrease.”

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals